Honolulu Board of Water Supply · Groundwater

Honolulu, HI tap water quality

79/100

Honolulu's tap water scores 79 out of 100 on published data, a middling result: legal on every reported measure, but with readings above health-based guidance. EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring detected PFAS (PFHxS 3 ppt); lead measured none detected at the 90th percentile against a 15 ppb action level.

Every figure, with its benchmark

Subscores run from 100 at the health benchmark to 0 at the legal limit. The city score is the weighted average of the 5 inputs published for this system.

MeasureResultHealth benchmarkLegal limitSubscoreSource
Leadnone detected 2023115100Utility report
TTHMs15 ppb1580100Utility report
HAA50.7 ppb1560100Utility report
Nitrate0.19–0.37 ppm510100Utility report
PFASPFHxS 3 pptnon-detectany25EPA UCMR 5

Is there PFAS in Honolulu's water?

Yes. EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring detected PFAS in Honolulu's system. The compounds and levels recorded were: PFHxS 3 parts per trillion. For context, EPA's enforceable limits for PFOA and PFOS are 4 ppt each, phased in through 2029; several other compounds have no federal limit yet.

How much lead is in Honolulu's tap water?

Honolulu's most recent lead 90th-percentile result is none detected. That means nine in ten sampled homes measured at or below that level, and it is a summary figure, not the maximum any single household saw. The federal action level is 15 ppb, but that is a trigger for utility action, not a health threshold: no level of lead exposure is considered safe (EPA, CDC), and lead almost always enters through household plumbing and service lines rather than the treatment plant.

Is Honolulu tap water safe to drink?

Honolulu's water meets federal legal standards on the measures its utility reports. We score it 79 out of 100 against health-based guidance, which is stricter than the legal minimum by design. Those are two different questions, and most coverage collapses them: a supply can be entirely lawful and still carry readings above the level health researchers would prefer. This score answers the second question, and the table above shows exactly which measure moved it.

Has Honolulu's water been in violation?

EPA's compliance record shows 130 violations for this system, 3 of them health-based, none of them since 2020. A health-based violation means a contaminant exceeded a legal limit or required treatment was not delivered. The rules most often cited here: Coliform (TCR) (3). Most recent entry: 2013.

Context matters when reading these. Large systems accumulate more violations simply by having more sampling points and more years on record, and a violation from a decade ago says little about water leaving the plant today. What is worth attention is a recent pattern rather than a single old entry.

What can you do about it?

If lead is the concern here, the fix is almost never the treatment plant: it's the service line and the plumbing inside the building. Running the tap for thirty seconds after long stagnation, using cold water for drinking and cooking, and asking your utility whether your address has a lead service line are all free. A filter certified to NSF/ANSI 53 for lead is the next step. If PFAS is the concern, NSF/ANSI 53 does not cover it: look for NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis or a filter specifically certified under NSF/ANSI 53 for PFOA and PFOS reduction.

Compare Honolulu with the rest

Fifty of the largest US systems, scored the same way, every figure cited.