EPA UCMR 5 · 2023–2025 monitoring
PFAS in Texas drinking water
EPA tested 1,121 public water systems in Texas for PFAS under UCMR 5. 601 of them had at least one detection, a rate of 53.6%, which is 6th highest of the 51 states and territories with comparable testing. Systems with a detection serve roughly 25,131,918 people in Texas.
Texas systems with the highest PFAS results
Highest single compound result recorded at each system during UCMR 5 monitoring.
| Water system | Population served | Highest result |
|---|---|---|
| City of Sugar Land | 90,909 | 672 ppt |
| City of Gonzales | 9,172 | 597 ppt |
| Cross Timbers Wsc | 8,751 | 441 ppt |
| City of Cameron | 5,489 | 339 ppt |
| City of Angleton | 19,429 | 205 ppt |
Which PFAS compounds were found in Texas?
The compounds detected most often across Texas systems were: PFBA (527 systems), PFPeA (388 systems), PFHxA (340 systems), PFBS (202 systems). Only five PFAS currently carry enforceable federal limits, phased in through 2029 (EPA on PFAS risk). Several of the most commonly detected compounds, including PFPeA and PFBA, have no federal limit at all, which is why a system can be fully compliant and still show detections.
What about lead in Texas?
Across the 415 Texas systems serving 10,000 people or more, the median lead 90th-percentile result is 1.12 ppb. The federal action level is 15 ppb, but that is a trigger for utility action rather than a health threshold: no level of lead exposure is considered safe. Lead almost always enters through service lines and household plumbing rather than the treatment plant, so a low statewide median tells you about the systems, not about your building.
How often do Texas systems break drinking water law?
Across 4,615 active community water systems in Texas, 1,520 have recorded at least one health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation since 2020, a rate of 32.9 percent. Those systems serve about 10,114,268 people. Nationally the equivalent figure is 58.8 million.
A health-based violation means a contaminant exceeded a legal limit or required treatment was not delivered, as distinct from a missed sampling deadline. Small rural systems dominate these counts everywhere: one operator, no treatment budget, and a few hundred customers. Read it as a picture of a state's smallest utilities more than of its cities. Full national analysis.
Is Texas tap water safe to drink?
On the PFAS measure specifically, 53.6 percent of tested Texas systems recorded a detection, against a national picture where about a third of tested systems did. That is a statement about the state, not about your tap: within any state, results vary enormously between systems drawing from different sources. The only figure that describes your water is your own utility's, which is why we would rather send you to look it up than have you act on a state average.
For what these compounds are understood to do in the body, see ATSDR on PFAS health effects. One rule worth carrying: a system with no UCMR 5 record has not been shown to be clean. It has not been tested. We never label an untested system as PFAS-free, and neither should anyone else.
Texas cities we score in detail
Full contaminant breakdowns, with every figure cited:
How does your own system compare?
Fifty of the largest US water systems, scored against health guidance, every figure linked to its source.